1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Report Continued from LIC 9099C...
It was also alleged that staff is not keeping hallway free of obstruction. It was reported that there are brooms and other objects in the hallways creating a hazard and concern for residents’ safety. During the visit on 03/17/2025, the LPA, along with the Residential Program Manager, conducted a walkthrough of the facility. The following was observed: the facility had all cleaning supplies locked and inaccessible to residents at the time of the visit. Brooms, mops, and dust pans were observed hanging by a hallway. However, items were not observed obstructing the emergency exit. Staff interviews confirmed that all cleaning supplies are properly stored and hung when not in use. Furthermore, all hallways were observed to be clean and free of obstructions. Based on observation and interviews, the Department has insufficient evidence to support the allegation “staff not keeping hallway free of obstruction”. Therefore, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
It was further alleged that there is Insufficient staffing. It was reported that staff is rotated between facilities; however, there are not enough to cover all houses. Per facility program, Policy Title: Staffing – Pg 44, it states that one Residential Recovery Counselor is scheduled for the Casa on the day shift and two Residential Recovery Counselors are scheduled on the evening and night shifts seven days a week. During the course of the investigation, the LPA obtained and reviewed timecards and staff schedules for the month of February 2025 and conducted interviews with both staff and clients. At the time of the complaint allegation, there were at least two staff members scheduled for each shift in the AM, PM, and NOC shift. Timecard reviews confirmed that, although staff schedules varied, there was sufficient staffing to cover any unforeseen shortages. Further record review and interviews conducted revealed the availability of on-call staff, as well as the use of outside agency staffing when necessary. During interviews, staff reported no concerns regarding staffing levels, stating that they have been fully staffed for some time. Staff also indicated that there are typically two to three staff members working during each shift. In addition, the facilities use ‘floaters’ who are able to move freely throughout the facilities to provide assistance where needed. Client interviews revealed that they regularly observed at least three staff members working during each shift and reported no concerns regarding staffing or living at the facility. Furthermore, a review of Guardian records confirmed that all staff are fingerprint-cleared and associated with all on-site facilities, allowing them to pick up double shifts or work at other facilities as needed. Based on the information obtained and reviewed during the course of the investigation, the Department has insufficient evidence to support the allegation of “insufficient staffing”. Therefore, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.
|