1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During the interview with C1, C1 stated S1 did not yell at C1 but was upset with C1 for reporting the bedbugs to the day program and told C1 they should have not reported the bed bugs. During the interview with S1, S1 denied yelling at C1 or being upset with C1 for reporting the bed bugs and denied telling C1 it was their fault for not being able to attend day program and to learn to stay quiet. Based on the information obtained, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegations of 'Facility staff yelled at client' and 'Facility staff made inappropriate comments to client' occurred. Therefore, the allegations are deemed unsubstantiated at this time.
The allegation of 'Facility staff is retaliating against client' alleged S1 was retaliating by refusing to contact C1's day program and a write letter stating services were completed for bed bugs so C1 can resume attendance due to C1 reporting bed bugs. During the interview with S1, S1 denied retaliating against C1. They said yesterday, 02/28/2023 was a busy day for S1, but they were able to type the letter and fax it to the day program in the afternoon. The LPA was given a copy of a letter dated 02/28/2023, signed by Administrator Juliana Anos indicating a bed bug treatment was conducted in C1's bedroom. Based on the information obtained, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation of 'Facility staff is retaliating against client' occurred. Therefore, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time.
Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report and appeal rights were provided. |