1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 02/22/2021 at 1:00 PM, LPA Lopez conducted a virtual interview with S1. S1’s attorney was also present. On 02/24/2021 at 4:12 PM, the LPA conducted a telephonic interview with Staff #6 (S6). On 02/26/2021 at 1:03 PM, the LPA conducted a telephonic interview with Staff #7 (S7). On 03/01/2021, the LPA conducted a telephonic interview with Staff #8 (S8) at 11:56 AM and Staff #9 (S9) at 1:11 PM. On 03/17/2021, the LPA conducted a telephonic interview with Individual #1 (I1) at 9:01 AM and Individual #2 (I2) at 12:54 PM.
A review of facility records was conducted, including but not limited to, facility emails, staff schedules, S1’s personnel records and the 06/08/2020 CALVet Investigation Report. The LPA also obtained and reviewed the California Highway Patrol (CHP) Arrest-Investigation report on 03/17/2021. A copy of the Hearing Exhibits were also received and reviewed by the LPA. All these records were reviewed numerous times on various dates throughout the investigation.
During the interview with R1, they stated S1 asked to borrow $20.00 from R1 and then paid R1 back. R1 stated that around this time, R1 noticed five $2.00 bills were missing. They also noticed a bag of quarters were missing. During the interview with R2, R2 stated they gave S1 $20.00 to buy R2 honey, but never received the honey or the money back. R2 also stated in June 2019, while at the Chumash Casino, R2 offered S1 their gambling card to purchase a meal. When S1 was unable to use R2’s gambling card without R2 presence, R2 purchased S1 a meal which cost about $7.00 or $8.00. R2 also stated they gave S1, $100 in the past to purchase a toaster oven for the communal kitchen in the facility.
Interviews with S2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S7, S8, and S9, revealed no first-hand knowledge of S1 ever borrowing any money from any resident or any knowledge of S1 taking anything from any resident rooms. During the interview with S5, S5 stated they were in charge cleaning R1’s room, but S1 helped S5 clean R1’s room and cleaned R1’s room on S5’s days off.
Interviews with R4, R5, R6, R7, and R8 reported staff have never requested to borrow money from them or had any missing items in their room; or, suspected S1 of taking anything from their room. During the interview with R3, R3 suspected S1 took shampoo from R3’s room, but there was no proof to substantiate this statement.
Report continued on LIC 809-C. |