1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Based on the review of the report, on 4/11/20, Officer made a visit to the above facility to conduct the investigation. Officer interviewed the resident#1(R1) first and than interviewed caregivers, staff#1(S1) and staff#2(S2). During the interview, R1 expressed that S1 is being rough when cleaning, but did not believe that is sexual in nature. The report reflects that based on their observation and interviews law enforcement could not establish the crime, however believed that R1 was just not happy with male caregiver providing the hygiene care.
LPA learned during the investigation that above facility has a live-in caregivers, husband and wife for long time. Interview with the administrator revealed that there is no complaint or concerns that she is aware of this nature. They were surprised when the officer visited the facility and heard of the allegation first time. She stated, R1 moved in the facility on 3/28/20, did not complaint or raise the concern about receiving care from male caregivers to anyone at the facility or to her. Because R1 being on heavy side it was easier for male caregiver. However if they would have known that resident#1(R1) prefers female staff, they could have arranged that easily.
Interview with S2, revealed that normally she cares for female residents and S1 cares for male residents, but it's not always possible, specially in case of emergency. Now they are making sure female caregiver to provide care to R1 and make sure to ask for the permission before providing care to the opposite sex, if that is fine with them.
S1 denied any inappropriate touching or behavior while proving care to R1. S1 added that he did not see any indication of rejection of services or uncomfortableness while proving care to R1. S2 can't take care of R1 alone, because R1 is heavy and she needs S1's help.
On 6/17/20 @ 2:40 pm, LPA spoke with R1 via phone and was informed that he/she is happy with the care they are proving and have no concern or complaint.
Based on the information obtained during this investigation, there is an insufficient evidence to support the allegation that “A resident's personal rights were violated. “ Therefore, the above allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. No deficiencies cited at this time. A telephonic exit interview was conducted with Ms. Resales, and a hard copy was provided via email for signature. |