<meta name="robots" content="noindex">
Department of
SOCIAL SERVICES

Community Care Licensing


COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT

Facility Number: 565801963
Report Date: 07/12/2022
Date Signed: 07/12/2022 03:10:26 PM

Unsubstantiated


STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY

COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION
CCLD Regional Office,
, CA
This is an official report of an unannounced visit/investigation of a complaint received in our office on
08/07/2020 and conducted by Evaluator Kelly Dulek
COMPLAINT CONTROL NUMBER: 29-AS-20200807083844
FACILITY NAME:BROOKDALE CAMARILLOFACILITY NUMBER:
565801963
ADMINISTRATOR:GONZAGA, VINCENTFACILITY TYPE:
741
ADDRESS:6000 SANTA ROSA RDTELEPHONE:
(805) 388-8086
CITY:CAMARILLOSTATE: CAZIP CODE:
93012
CAPACITY:0CENSUS: 0DATE:
07/12/2022
UNANNOUNCEDTIME BEGAN:
01:45 PM
MET WITH:Imelda PerezTIME COMPLETED:
03:10 PM
ALLEGATION(S):
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Facility staff have not addressed resident's change in condition
Staff do not ensure that resident receives adequate medical attention
Facility is in disrepair (hot water)
Facility does not follow resident care plan
INVESTIGATION FINDINGS:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek conducted a subsequent complaint inspection with the purpose of delivering findings for the allegations listed above. Due to a Change of Ownership, this report was issued to current facility management at this location. LPA met with Resident Care Director Imelda Perez at 01:55 PM. Entrance interview conducted.

During today’s visit, LPA and Resident Care Director toured the facility at 01:59PM. No health and safety hazards were identified during facility tour. Previously, on 08/12/2020, LPA Aja Richardson conducted an initial complaint inspection virtually with the facility Administrator Vincent Gonzaga and then Wellness Director Jowell Ovenson. At 11:15 am, LPA Richardson conducted a physical plant tour with Jowell Ovenson. At 11:30 am, LPA Richardson conducted interviews with the Administrator and Wellness Director as well as request Resident #1 (R1's) records. Additionally, on the following dates, LPA Dulek interviewed staff and resident: 07/18/2021, 12/15/2021, 02/08/2022, 06/02/2022, and 06/09/2022. LPA also reviewed pertinent documents
Report Continued on LIC 9099-C
Unsubstantiated
Estimated Days of Completion:
SUPERVISOR'S NAME: TELEPHONE:
LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Kelly DulekTELEPHONE:
LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE:

DATE: 07/12/2022
I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received.
FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE:

DATE: 07/12/2022
This report must be available at Child Care and Group Home facilities for public review for 3 years.
LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)
Page: 1 of 3
Control Number 29-AS-20200807083844
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY

COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT (Cont)
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION
CCLD Regional Office,
, CA
FACILITY NAME: BROOKDALE CAMARILLO
FACILITY NUMBER: 565801963
VISIT DATE: 07/12/2022
NARRATIVE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
throughout the course of the investigation. The following was then determined:

Regarding the allegation: “Facility staff have not addressed resident's change in condition:”

Record review indicated R1’s care needs upon admission included assistance with the following: medication management and showers. R1 was able to independently dress, feed and transfer. Physician’s report completed just after this complaint was received indicated R1 is able to bathe with assistance, dress/groom self, able to feed self, and care for own toileting needs, but unable to administer own medications. Physician’s reports do not indicate a change in condition. Needs and Service plans reviewed also did not indicate a change in condition from Admission to the time of the complaint. Staff interviews revealed that R1’s care needs have remained consistent throughout the time R1 has resided at the facility and when a resident has a change in condition, staff are made aware and adjust their care accordingly. Based on record review and interview, although the allegation may be valid, at this time there is insufficient evidence to prove a violation did occur, therefore the allegation “facility staff have not addressed resident's change in condition” is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.

Regarding the allegation: “Staff do not ensure that resident receives adequate medical attention:”

Staff interviews revealed that R1 chooses not to utilize facility transportation, but has a private caregiver take R1 to all medical appointments. Prior to the COVID-19 outbreak, R1 would leave the facility frequently and did receive medical attention regularly. Staff and resident interviews later revealed that R1 attempted to change medical providers and subsequently could not find an alternate primary care provider. R1 refused to see medical professionals that conduct visits on site at the facility. R1 chose an alternate provider, but the provider required R1 change specialists, so R1 canceled services with the primary provider. R1’s family member does not help R1 find alternate care. Facility staff have attempted to assist R1 with scheduling appointments and locating adequate medical providers, however, R1 refused assistance. Based on record review and interview, although the allegation may be valid, at this time there is insufficient evidence to prove a violation did occur, therefore the allegation “staff do not ensure that resident received adequate medical attention” is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.

Regarding the allegation: “Facility is in disrepair (hot water):”

Photograph of a sign posted in the facility indicated hot water would be off on or around 08/05/2020 from


Report Continued on LIC 9099-C
SUPERVISOR'S NAME: TELEPHONE:
LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Kelly DulekTELEPHONE:
LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE:

DATE: 07/12/2022
I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received.
FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE:

DATE: 07/12/2022
LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)
Page: 2 of 3
Control Number 29-AS-20200807083844
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY

COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION REPORT (Cont)
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING DIVISION
CCLD Regional Office,
, CA
FACILITY NAME: BROOKDALE CAMARILLO
FACILITY NUMBER: 565801963
VISIT DATE: 07/12/2022
NARRATIVE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
3:00PM until the following morning. Interviews revealed that at that time one of the water heaters was being repaired. Although the hot water was turned off, there was sufficient hot water in the tank to ensure no interruption of service for resident showers and hand washing. Additionally, if a resident was concerned with the hot water, staff would assist the resident. R1 did not indicate to staff there was a concern at the time, therefore the staff were unable to assist R1. Staff interview revealed that the repair was completed timely and the interruption in hot water was less than originally estimated and was back on by 9:00PM that same day. Based on record review and interview, although the allegation may be valid, at this time there is insufficient evidence to prove a violation did occur, therefore the allegation “facility is in disrepair (hot water)” is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.

Regarding the allegation: “Facility does not follow resident care plan:”

Resident service plan dated upon admission indicates resident requires “perform blood sugar monitoring three or more times per week” and R1 “has generalized body pain…associate to provide reassurance to (R1) and assist with non-pharmacological measures to alleviate pain.” Interview revealed that facility staff did attempt to perform blood sugar readings. R1 chooses to eat breakfast in the morning prior to nursing staff are on premises to conduct a blood sugar reading. R1 refuses blood sugar check at the time the nurse is available and R1 indicated they do not want to wait until after the readings are completed to eat breakfast. R1 utilizes non-prescription creams and ointments as well as rubbing on R1’s lower extremities to help lower R1’s pain. Interviews revealed that in the mornings, staff assist R1 in washing off the previous day’s creams and apply all creams and ointments to R1’s body. In the afternoons, staff are able to rub lotions and creams on R1’s body. However, at night, before bed, when staff attempt to assist R1, R1 would like a caregiver to be present in R1’s room for approximately 1 hour. Staff indicated they are able to assist R1, but cannot spend an hour in R1’s room at that time. Staff offer to come back when there is more time to meet R1’s needs, but R1 yells at staff and tells them to leave. Interview with R1 revealed that R1 doesn’t believe the night staff are able to complete the tasks as R1 requests, therefore R1 does not want their assistance. R1 indicated the night time staff are “incompetent.” Based on record review and interview, although the allegation may be valid, at this time there is insufficient evidence to prove a violation did occur, therefore the allegation “staff do not ensure that resident received adequate medical attention” is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.

No citations issued. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided via email to Resident Care Director and Executive Director.

SUPERVISOR'S NAME: TELEPHONE:
LICENSING EVALUATOR NAME: Kelly DulekTELEPHONE:
LICENSING EVALUATOR SIGNATURE:

DATE: 07/12/2022
I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received.
FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE:

DATE: 07/12/2022
LIC9099 (FAS) - (06/04)
Page: 3 of 3