1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | It’s alleged that R1’s responsible party was unaware of this fall until R1’s follow-up doctor’s appointment.
Interviews and record review revealed that on 1/4/2020, staff reported to facility management that R1’s hand was swollen. A review of care notes obtained on 11/04/2021 documented that R1’s right wrist appeared to be swollen, was walking unsteady, and R1 also complained of back pain. R1 was assisted with the self-administration of pain medication, which appeared to have worked. R1’s family arrived at the facility later that day. Once hearing about the pain, R1's family indicated that R1 had suffered with arthritis, and R1’s family member allegedly ‘was not concerned’ with R1’s pain. However, R1’s family made the decision to take R1 to the emergency room on 01/04/2020. R1 returned to the facility hours later with no new orders, yet was advised to obtain a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan to rule out the possibility of a stroke.
A review of facility nursing progress notes indicated that R1 had a follow up appointment on 1/9/2020 and 1/23/2020 to conduct labs and for additional referrals. However, there was no indication that staff attended either of these appointments. Records reviewed indicated that R1 had a follow-up doctor’s appointment on 1/30/2020, in which notes indicated that R1 had been experiencing pain in the right hip for the past month. It was documented that R1 had suffered a fall on 01/06/2020, yet there was no further documentation as to whom communicated this information to the doctor. X-ray imaging completed on R1’s hip displaced no degenerative changes, no abnormalities, or arthritis. Yet, a review of resident records and interviews were unable to provide corroborating evidence that R1 had suffered a fall, or that staff had reported a fall.
Staff interviews revealed inconclusive information regarding this incident. An interview was conducted with the staff who was identified as attending the follow up doctor’s appointment; however, this staff denied claims that they were present during this visit and denied claims that they communicated to R1’s responsible party that R1 had suffered a fall. Staff who had provided care to R1 confirmed recollection of R1 having a swollen hand. However, staff denied knowledge of R1 suffering a fall. Staff interviews indicated that if a resident suffers a fall or is presumed to have fallen, staff would have reported to the clinic staff, and it would have been documented on an incident report. In addition, it would have been reported to a responsible party.
Based on the information obtained from interviews and record review, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim staff failed to report R1’s fall to R1’s responsible party. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is insufficient evidence to prove the above-mentioned claim at the time the complaint was received. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
No deficiencies cited at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.
|