1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The interviews with the administrators revealed that due to the diagnosis of dementia, R1 sometimes gets agitated and rubbing the head helps R1 calm down. Review of the other staff members statements also collaborate the information about the agitation and need of physical assurance. Based on the administrator's interview with S1 and written statement provided by S1, she was not in the bed with R1, but was sitting on the side of bed, gently rubbing R1's head to comfort R1. S1 did admit her mistake of closing the door behind her. The administrator, Sherry stated S1 is long time employee of the facility, does not have any negative comment or complaint from anyone and they have not observed any inappropriate behavior towards residents.
Based on the Officer's interview with S1, she was sitting on side of bed and rubbing R1's forehead, was not in the bed with R1. There is no other witness to this incident. Officer was unable to interview R1 due to cognitive limitations. Police record revealed that due to the conflicting statement of staff#1(S1) and staff#2 (S2), they were unable to establish the crime.
LPA was unable to interview R1 due to diagnosis of dementia.
Based on the information obtained during this investigation there is an insufficient evidence to support the allegation that “Inappropriate conduct by staff“ therefore, the above allegation is deemed unsubstantiated, that means that allegation may or may not be true but there is no evidence present at this time. No deficiency issued.
A telephonic exit interview was conducted with Ms. Shahrzad, and a hard copy was provided via email for signature.
|