1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 05/23/2021 and 05/14/2021 R2 had to wait 20 minutes for staff response; R4 had the following wait times, on 05/15/2021 24 minutes, 05/18/2021 30 minutes, 05/21/2021 36 minutes, 05/31/2021 32 minutes, 06/08/2021 28 minutes, 06/11/2023, 20 minutes, and 06/14/2021 22 minutes, R6 had the following wait time, on 06/01/2021 45 minutes, 06/02/2021 22 minutes, 06/02/2021 58 minutes, 06/03/2021 29 minutes, 06/03/2021 35 minutes, 06/04/2021 1 hour and 16 minutes, 06/05/2021 53 minutes, 06/07/2021 1 hour 2 minutes, 06/08/2021 1 hour 4 minutes, 06/10/2021 1 hour 19 minutes, 06/10/2021 32 minutes, 06/11/2021 1 hr 12 minutes, 06/14/2021 40 minutes.
During the 06/14/2021 visit, the LPA met with Business Office Manager at the time Annabel Amaya, who reported they did have issues with staff at the time and were in the process of hiring additional staff but were using agency staff to help supplement. Ms. Amaya said staff should be responding within 10 minutes to pendent calls. During the interview with S1 they stated recently due to there being only one staff (S1) and one agency staff on shift, they did not respond timely to R6 and it took over 30 minutes for S1 to respond.
Based on the information obtained, there is sufficient evidence to support the allegation occurred. Therefore the allegation of 'Staff does not respond to pendent calls timely' is deemed Substantiated at this time.
The following deficiency was observed (See LIC 9099-D.) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and/or California Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview and report reviewed with Jennifer Miller. A copy of the report and appeal rights were provided. |