1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 06/17/2024, LPA Cortez conducted a subsequent visit, conducted a record review and staff interview. On 06/18/2024 LPA Cortez conducted staff interviews and obtained pertinent documents. During today’s visit, LPA Cortez delivered findings.
Staff did not ensure that resident's toileting needs were met.
On the allegation that Staff did not ensure that resident's toileting needs were met, the reporting parties concern is that staff did not respond timely for calls for assistance with toileting, and as a result Resident#1 (R1) would have accidents and wet themselves. To investigate the allegation, file review and interviews were conducted. Staff interviews revealed that when the facility is short staff, residents can go without showers and additionally staff interviews revealed that due to being short-staffed staff would not get to R1 timely and R1 would sometimes be wet when they got to R1. Furthermore, staff interviews revealed that if staff is busy it can take up to forty-five minutes to an hour to assist residents when they pressed their pendant. Record review conducted revealed that on numerous occasions it took longer than 30 minutes for R1’s call button to be answered. During December 2022, R1 had approximately 28 pendant calls that took approximately 30 minutes or longer to be answered, with one pendant call on December 31, 2022 taking approximately one hour and forty-two minutes to answer. Lastly, on 06/18/2024, at approximately 1:50 p.m. LPA Cortez heard staff calling for assistance from other staff to assist with a resident transfer over the radio for over twenty minutes. The staff's call for assistance went without being answered for approximately over twenty (20) minutes. Based on interviews, file review, and observation, the above allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time.
Staff billed resident for services not received.
On the allegation that Staff billed resident for services not received, the reporting parties concern is that per the admission agreement after a resident is out of the community for fifteen consecutive days a credit/refund for personal care would be issued, and staff charged Resident#1 (R1) for personal care for days R1 was at the hospital, at a skilled nursing and not in the community. It was further reported that R1 was taken to the hospital on January 5, 2023, and did not return to the facility until January 27, 2023. To investigate the allegation, record review and interviews were conducted. The LPA reviewed R1’s admission agreement which states the following: D. Adjustments to Fees or Services. 3. Absences from Sage Mountain Senior Living. If you are absent from _ Sage Mountain Senior Living for a period of fourteen (14) consecutive days or more, you will be entitled to a credit beginning on the fifteenth (15th) day of absence in the amount set forth in Appendix A. Report will continue on LIC9099-C (3RD PAGE). |