1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 3
Chart notes from 6/1/21 at 10:13pm indicate the resident was being discharged back to the facility. The ER doctor stated the catheter was functioning fine and recommended to follow up with a urologist. The facility chart notes also indicated that the ER doctor stated R1’s pressure wound was unstageable.
Chart notes indicated the resident returned to the facility on 6/1/21 at 11:45pm, with no new medication or treatment orders and a diagnosis of foley catheter malfunction, but was advised to follow up with urology and wound care specialist. Charting notes indicate the HHA was informed of the wound care request. Chart notes from 6/2/21 at 1:20pm indicate a HHA nurse came to reassess R1’s pressure injury on the buttocks. The HHA nurse stated R1’s pressure injury wound was unstageable. R1 was sent to the ER again due to the prohibited health condition.
Based on the information obtained during the investigation, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that due to neglect, R1 sustained a pressure injury. R1’s care and status was regularly monitored by appropriately skilled professionals and staff kept R1’s HHA up to date regarding any changes of condition. Although R1’s catheter required attention, R1’s HHA was monitoring it and staff continued to tend to R1’s catheter within the scope of their care. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the above-mentioned claim at the time the complaint was received. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
No deficiencies cited at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.
|