1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | during any attack due to their mental impairment, limited communication and non-ambulatory status, yet staff still allowed R1 to return to their shared room throughout the night. Staff did not provide any additional safety checks inside R1 and R2’s room, even though R1 was acting erratically and R2 was unable to get out of bed without assistance. Based on interview and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the allegation above is deemed SUBSTANTIATED at this time.
Allegation: “Facility did not reappraise resident(s) in care” and “facility retained a resident that required a higher level of care:”
Record review revealed that upon admittance to the facility, R1’s diagnoses included, but were not limited to Parkinson’s Disease, Unspecified Psychosis not due to a substance or known, and unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance. During a care conference on 05/02/2024, it was noted that R1 had increased hallucinations in addition to delusions. At that time, R1 was residing in a private room on the first floor. Management indicated that the lower floor is geared toward higher-functioning residents with dementia diagnoses and the upstairs area is designated for more advanced dementia and residents who require additional ADL care. Staff interviews revealed that R1 was moved upstairs to a shared room on 06/27/2024. Following the move to the second floor, R1 was noted with increased anxiety and agitation particularly later in the day, however R1 had a lower dosage of PRN medication prescribed for agitation at that time. On 08/30/2024, facility staff sent a request to R1’s physician indicating “pt mood is unstable” and R1’s physician ordered blood work. R1 visited the emergency room on 09/13/2024 due to syncope, orthostatic hypotension and seizure. On 10/17/2024, R1’s physician ordered an increased dose of Lorazepam twice daily as needed for agitation. Additionally, R1’s behaviors had changed more in the days and weeks leading up to 11/01/2024. The facility did have a form for Behavior Mapping dated 10/22/2024, with indications of R1 being awake in their room or awake in the hallway during the overnight hours. R1 was noted to be “withdrawn,” “anxious,” or “pacing” at these times. Staff interviewed stated R1s agitation the last three (3) or four (4) days has been “out of control” and “not re-directable.” On the night of the incident, all staff working were aware that R1 was “acting very dangerous” prior to the incident occurring, however, staff did not inform management nor intervene by calling 9-1-1 when R1 attacked S1 earlier in the evening. R1’s care plan was dated 04/14/2024; no new reappraisal nor care plan was assessed based on the observed changes in R1’s behavior. R1 was seen by Behavioral Health on 10/31/2024 and noted with “major depressive disorder” and document indicates “no cognitive impairment noted.” Based on interview and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the allegations above are deemed SUBSTANTIATED at this time. Report Continued on LIC 9099-C (p. 5) |