1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | R1’s body or any other details. Interviews conducted with staff denied staff handing R1, or any resident, in a rough manner. R1’s medical records from Los Robles Regional Medical Center for R1’s hospitalizations on 10/25/2023 and 03/30/2024 did not note any bruising on R1’s body. The information obtained during the investigation did not include evidence sufficient to corroborate the above allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not sufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
Regarding allegation: 4.) Facility staff did not ensure resident had sufficient intake of food. It was alleged that R1 was not being fed and the food being served to R1, R1 would not eat. Per record review, R1 was admitted to the facility on 08/22/2023. Per R1’s physician report dated 05/31/2023, R1 was to be on a diabetic diet. R1’s Preplacement appraisal dated 08/17/2023, noted R1’s special diet as diabetic. R1’s service plan, dated 09/06/2023, listed raw onion as R1’s allergy. LPA Peraldi reviewed R1’s home health visit report notes from 07/10/2023 through 03/25/2024 and the following was noted: R1’s home health notes mention R1’s appetite depends on what is being served to R1. On 07/10/2023 and 03/04/2024, it was noted that R1 had difficulty complying with any medical instructions (for example medications, diets, exercise) within the past 3 months. On 03/04/2024, it was noted that R1 rarely eats a complete meal and generally eats only about half of any food offered. It was noted that R1 also drinks protein shakes and dietary supplements to increase calories. Throughout R1’s home health notes R1 was also noted to have diminished cardiovascular capacity and generalized weakness which also attributed to R1’s lack of appetite. During the initial complaint visit and subsequent visits, the LPAs observed a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. Four (4) out of four (4) residents interviewed revealed that the food is good, adequate, and well portioned. The information obtained during the investigation did not include evidence sufficient to corroborate the above allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not sufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
Regarding allegation: 5.) Facility staff did not answer resident’s calls for assistance. It was alleged that R1 would wait 30 minutes for facility staff to assist R1 when the call button was pressed. Interview with the Administrator revealed that R1 would press the call button but then a second later would press it again which turns off the call. The Administrator said that staff would remind R1 to only press the button once. The Administrator also explained that for residents who can’t use the call buttons, there are bed pads that have
Report Continued on LIC 9099-C
|