1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation: Due to lack of supervision, resident suffered a fall, resulting in injuries
It was alleged that due to lack of care and supervision, R1 fell and sustained injuries. Interviews and a review of surveillance video revealed that on 7/16/2021, R1 was walking on the first floor with Staff #1 (S1) when R1 ran into an object inside the facility and fell over their walker. Interviews with S1 revealed that S1 believed they were approximately eight to ten feet behind R1 and alleged they kept their distance to ‘monitor’ R1. However, per the video surveillance footage of the incident, Investigator Seng concluded that S1 was approximately twenty (20) feet behind R1. In addition, video surveillance captured S1’s head facing downward towards a black object in their hand as R1 ambulated ahead of them. Due to the fall, R1 suffered lacerations to their face and a contusion to the right eye. Nursing staff believed that R1’s wounds were superficial, and placed steri-strips over R1’s wounds. Nursing staff, which included S1, ran neurological examinations throughout the night on R1 and determined that R1 did not require hospitalization.
The morning of 7/17/2021, R1 became agitated and ripped out the steri-strips and dug into their wounds, causing the wounds to reopen. Staff could not stop the bleeding, so R1 was sent to the hospital. A review of hospital paperwork revealed that R1 was diagnosed with recurrent falls, sinus bradycardia, right periorbital hematoma, scalp hematoma, and fractures. Discharge notes further documented old bruising to R1’s anterior chest wall into the right upper arm, signifying ‘old right-sided rib fractures’. Lastly, it noted ‘left anterolateral 6th and 7th rib fractures’ which were documented as ‘2 new rib fractures’.
Based on information obtained during the investigation, there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that due to lack of supervision, R1 suffered a fall, resulting in multiple injuries. Interviews with current and former staff, and staff from collateral agencies whom provided care for R1 noted that walking in a distance in excess of eight feet from R1 would not allow sufficient time for staff to intervene and take corrective action. Per the surveillance footage, S1 appeared to be distracted and the distance behind R1 appeared to be too significant for S1 to intervene. This allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time.
Regarding the allegation: Facility did not seek medical attention in a timely manner.
It was alleged that R1 should have been sent to the hospital following their fall the evening of 7/16/2021, as R1 struck their head. Staff interviews revealed that staff decided against sending R1 to the hospital as R1’s wounds appeared to be superficial, and nursing staff were monitoring R1 throughout the night. |