1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from LIC 9099
Regarding allegation “Licensee did not ensure phone calls are answered appropriately” the Reporting Party (RP) expressed concern that the facility’s main phone line is not answered in a timely manner, making it difficult to get in contact with Resident #1 (R1). The RP and a case manager further reported difficulty communicating with staff at AASTA and R1, noting that R1 does not have a personal cellphone and the only means of communication is through the facility’s main phone line. Staff interviews conducted revealed that staff are sometimes unable to answer the facility phone because they are responsible for transporting residents to appointments, conducting daily activities within the facility, assisting with brief changes and showers, medication distribution, and performing other essential care services. The LPA interviewed R1, who confirmed they do not have a personal cellphone and stated that staff rarely approach them to inform them that they’ve received a call. Interviews with facility representatives denied the allegation, stating that although the facility has encountered challenges maintaining a full-time receptionist, there is always a staff member assigned to answer phone calls throughout the day. During the course of the investigation, the LPA attempted to contact the facility by phone on four (4) separate occasions and at different times of the day. On the first attempt, the LPA reached a live person; however, it took approximately 25 minutes after navigating all menu extensions and being redirected by voice commands. On the remaining three attempts, the LPA was unable to reach a live person, as no one answered the phone. Based on the information gathered during the investigation, the department has sufficient evidence to confirm this allegation occurred. Therefore, the allegation of “Licensee did not ensure phone calls are answered appropriately” has been SUBSTANTIATED at this time.
Pursuant to Title 22, California Code of Regulations and/or CA Health and Safety Code, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 9099-D.) Administrator was informed that failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties.
An immediate civil penalty of $1,000 repeat violation is assessed today due to being cited for the same violation within 12 months. Administrator was informed that additional civil penalties might be assessed based on Health and Safety Code 1569.49(e) and 1569.49(f).
Exit interview conducted, appeal rights discussed, and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.
|