1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding allegation, “Staff handled resident roughly, resulting in injury” – The reporting party alleged that staff #1(S1) handled Memory Care residents roughly. It was alleged that S1 pushed Resident #1’s (R1s) wheelchair very hard and R1s shin hit the wheelchair's footrest, which caused a skin tear (date and time of the alleged incident is unknown). It was also alleged that R1 is often bruised or with small unexplained skin tears. Interviews conducted and documents reviewed reflected R1 would be agitated and combative when staff would try to assist; therefore, staff would let R1 calm down and would go back at a later time to assist. Interviews further reflected that staff did not force R1 with anything. Staff also mentioned that R1 would bruise easily; however, did not recall specific injury incident as alleged. LPA attempted to contact Staff #1 (S1) on 11/03/2023 at 3 PM and on 11/6/2023 at 10 PM and 2 PM, however was unsuccessful.
Additionally, on 11/02/2023, at approximately 3:30 PM, LPA contacted the Reporting Party (RP) for additional details; however, RP did not have any further details to provide. Moreover, documents reviewed did not reflect the alleged incident/injury. LPA also attempted to interview random residents in the memory care unit, however they were unable to communicate due to cognitive decline. Potential witness/families of residents interviewed did not reveal any rough handling or mistreatment by staff towards residents. Based on the above information gathered although the allegation may be valid, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation or that a violation occurred; therefore, the above allegation “Staff handled resident roughly, resulting in injury” is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.
Regarding allegation, “Staff do not ensure resident receives meals” - The complainant alleged that staff do not get R1 up for breakfast or lunch; staff often leave R1 in bed hungry until 01:00 PM. Staff interviewed reported that R1 was receiving hospice services, did not have an appetite and usually did not get up for breakfast. Therefore, R1 was provided with a meal when R1 was awake and ready to eat. Staff interviewed denied the allegation that “staff do not ensure resident receives meals”. Staff reported that all residents are provide three (3) meals a day including snacks in between meals. During initial visit and subsequent visits to the facility, LPA observed the dining room area in Memory Care and observed residents eating. Potential witness/families interviewed did not express any concern with residents receiving meals. Based on the above information gathered although the allegations may be valid, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation or that a violation occurred; therefore, the above allegation “Staff do not ensure resident receives meals” is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. (Continue to LIC9099c) |