1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued on LIC 9099-C
LPA Conway conducted an initial complaint visit on 08/27/2024. During that visit, LPA conducted a tour of the physical plant, obtained copy of the resident and staff roster and obtained pertinent information relevant to the investigation. LPA also conducted staff interviews at 11:05 A.M, and 1:15 P.M. At 12:53 P.M., LPA interviewed Administrator via phone. Furthermore, LPA interviewed Reporting Party (RP) on 08/26/2024, 09/17/2024 and on 09/19/2024. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed all documents obtained and conducted telephonic interviews with additional credible witnesses and other relevant parties. The following was then determined:
The complaint alleges that Resident 1 (R1), a dementia resident, walked out of the facility unnoticed through an unlocked door and was later found on the ground in the driveway by staff. During an interview with R1’s responsible person (RP), it was stated that R1 was found on the ground outside the facility. According to the RP, an ambulance was called, and R1 was transported to the hospital, where a CT scan was conducted. Upon request for documentation supporting these events, the RP was unable to produce any records. A review of R1’s service plan dated on 11/14/2023, states under background information, that R1 is “looking for escape all day” and has wandering and sundowning behavior. However, LPA did not observe documentation of a recent hospital visit or records related to this alleged incident. Additionally, During the initial visit, LPA observed that the main gate leading to the street and garage door were opened. During the plant tour, LPA observed two (2) non-ambulatory residents lying in bed. Interviews with facility staff indicated that, to the best of their knowledge, this incident did not occur. The facility representative also denied that R1 left the facility without staff noticing. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, and despite the information on R1’s documents and the RP statement, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation “Resident wandered away from the facility due to lack of care or supervision from staff" is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.
Exit interview conducted/No citations issues/ A copy of report was provided. |