1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 04/14/2026, the LPA conducted phone interviews with two (2) family members of R1 including their POA.
On the allegation, “Staff did not address resident's change in condition” it is the concern of the reporting party (RP) that staff did not adequately monitor Resident 1 (R1) or follow hospice nurse instructions regarding R1's care. It was reported that in early 2026 (exact date was not provided), a hospice nurse identified that R1 was constipated and instructed staff to notify the on-call nurse if no bowel movement (BM) occurred by the following day. Staff reportedly failed to provide this update. Family members later discovered R1 feverish, shaking, with cloudy fluid in their Foley bag and noted that R1 had not had a BM in seven days. The family, rather than staff, contacted the on-call nurse. To investigate the allegation the LPA conducted telephonic and in-person interviews, as well as record reviews of facility records.
Interview with Assistant Administrator Abygail Go revealed that staff monitored R1’s condition and documented BMs. She noted that hospice instructions were to call after three days without a BM, though she admitted staff occasionally waited until the fourth day if a nurse visit was already scheduled or if R1 had a BM at night. Staff interviews revealed inconsistent protocols; while one staff member confirmed reporting to the Administrator and not hospice, another was unaware of who was responsible for BM tracking. During a telephone interview, Hospice Nurse 1 (HP1) confirmed that staff were verbally instructed to call after R1 had not had a BM after three (3) days and noted that while staff generally followed it, there was at least one instance where they waited five days to call. HP1 doubted R1 ever went seven days without a BM. Facility BM log for January and February 2026 contradict the seven-day claim but confirm inconsistencies in care. Logs show that in February, R1 went four consecutive days without a BM on two separate occasions (2/6–2/9 and 2/13–2/16), exceeding the three-day limit set by hospice. Based on staff interviews, admissions from the Administrator and file review, there is sufficient evidence to support the allegation and that a violation occurred; therefore, the above allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time.
The following deficiency was cited from the CA Code of Regulations, Title 22 (refer to LIC 9099-D). Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview held, appeal rights and report copy provided. |