1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation included two unannounced inspections, a review of records, and interviews with the complainant, licensee, assistant, and parents. LPA contacted complainant to provide further documents and information nothing further was provided by the complainant.
During both unannounced inspections LPA observed the FCCH operating within the required child ratio with the assistant present. A review of records and the police incident report received did not reveal any evidence of wrongdoing by the licensee or the FCCH. The licensee and assistant denied the allegations.
Parents interviewed reported no concerns regarding the care and supervision provided to their children. They stated that the licensee informs them whenever their child sustains an injury while in care. Overall, the parents expressed satisfaction with the care, supervision, and communication provided by the FCCH.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
No deficiencies were cited during today's inspection.
A Notice of Site Visit was issued and must remain posted for 30 days. Appeal Rights were provided. An exit interview was conducted, and this report was reviewed with the licensee, Maria Cisneros. Failure to comply with the posting requirements may result in an immediate civil penalty of $100. |