1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 12/09/2021, LPA Lopez conducted a Collateral inspection at Oakmont of Camarillo 565850169 and reviewed records for R1 and conducted interviews with Administrator Martha Berard and Staff #1 (S1) between 11:08 AM and 12:41 PM.
Record review revealed on 02/07/2020, R1 had Resident Assessment conducted by Staff #2 (S2) due to a change of condition. The assessment was signed by S2 and R1's responsible party. On 02/15/2020, another Resident Assessment was conducted for R1 by S2. This assessment increased R1's acuity points and billable points. This assessment was only signed by S2 and was not signed by R1 or their responsible party. The 02/15/2020 Cost of Care Communication for R1 indicates the resident had a change of condition and had an increased cost of care. The Cost of Care Communication has three method of delivery options of this document to the resident and/or the responsible party; "Presented to resident and date", "Presented to responsible party and date", and "Mailed, faxed or emailed to responsible party and date". No method of deliver is noted on this document signed by S2. The LPA reviewed and obtained a copy of R1's resident charges/payment ledger for the time period of 01/05/2020 through 12/03/2020. Record reveal beginning on 02/15/2020, R1 was billed an increased charge for care fees.
An undated letter written by Executive Director at the time, Zehra Syed stated concessions were given to R1 for a total of $4454.17 for the time period of 02/15-02/29, 03/01-03/31, 04/01-04/30, 05/01-05/31 and as of June 1, 2020 the licensee would no longer be giving concessions towards R1's care but as an act of good faith, R1's account has a fresh start.
Interviews revealed there is no record the updated 02/15/2020 assessment was presented to R1 or their responsible party, or mailed, faxed, or emailed to R1 or their responsible party, or that R1 and/or the responsible party received notice of a rate increase due to level of care change. Interviews also revealed, as of May 2020, S2 no longer worked for the licensee.
Based on the information obtained, the allegations of 'Facility did not review residents assessment with family member' and 'Facility raised fees without giving proper notice' are substantiated at this time.
A copy of the report and appeal rights were mailed to the licensee's mailing address via certified mail for signature. |