1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA also received staff notes from the facility about R1’s medications, such as when they called for refills, or copies of fax/email requests for refills. Until 02/16/2023, the specific narcotic medication for R1 indicated in the allegation was a Pro Re Nata (PRN) or an “as needed” medication. Until 02/16/2023, the instructions for the medication indicated that R1 was to take 1 tab of medication every 4 hours as needed for pain. However, on 02/16/2023, the instructions for the medication changed so that R1 was to take 1 tab of medication every 4 hours routine during the day. The MAR for the facility shows that the medication was given to R1 routinely as prescribed every 4 hours during the months of February and March 2023 unless it was specifically refused by R1 which occurred individually 3 times during March 2023. According to the Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Record, R1 had this specific narcotic medication filled by the pharmacy on 02/28/2023 for 180 tabs of medication routinely given every 4 hours, or 6 times a day. The schedule of this narcotic medication would mean that the next refill for R1 would be 1 month or 30 days after 02/28/2023. The date at which the narcotic medication should have been filled for R1 would have been 03/29/2023 or 03/30/2023 depending on whether the fill date is counted. Either way, 03/29/2023 was a Wednesday and 03/30/2023 was a Thursday. R1 indicated that the Pharmacy could not fill the prescription over the weekend of 04/01/2023 and 04/02/2023, but the medication should have been filled prior to the Friday of 03/31/2023 when R1 was out of the medication, went into withdrawal, and the pharmacy closed for the weekend (Saturday & Sunday). Administrator & Staff interviewed could not provide a reasonable explanation as to why R1's medication was not refilled in a timely manner.
Based on the information obtained, there is sufficient evidence to prove the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time.
On the allegation: Facility staff do not respond to resident’s call button. It is alleged that residents call for help with the call button and no staff members respond or come to the resident’s rooms.
On 04/13/2023, LPA received documented records of the facility call button system usage for each resident for 04/07/2023 and 04/08/2023. The facility Call History documentation lists the call type: Pendant call or emergency call, Area, Room, Floor, Call Time, Wait Time, and name of the resident calling. From the documented facility call history, all resident call button usage was responded to by staff members. Wait time for each call varied on type of call, being Pendant or Emergency calls. On 05/31/2023, LPA interviewed residents about the allegation and no resident interviewed by the LPA stated that they had been ignored by the staff of the facility when they pressed their call button. R1 had 6 pendant calls during this period, with 3 of the pendant calls occurring on 04/07/2023 & 2 pendant calls occurring on 04/08/2023. Contd. 9099-C
|