1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | It was also alleged that staff did not meet the needs of a child (C1) in care. LPA obtained a video recording of C1 crying. The video showed another staff member's legs in the background, showing that C1 was not left unattended. LPA was unable to prove that staff did not meet the needs of C1 due to communication between staff and the authorized representatives of C1. LPA also obtained a copy of the infant toddler contract explaining that if a child requires more one on one care and cannot participate in daily activities that the child will be sent home.
Based on LPA interviews, communication between staff and authorized representatives, and documentation received, the complaint was found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
Exit interview was conducted. Appeal rights were printed and provided. Notice of Site Visit was provided and should remain posted for 30 days. |