1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from LIC9099...
A finding that the complaint allegation Facility allowed dementia resident to move in without responsible parties knowledge is unsubstantiated meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Regarding allegation of Facility threatened resident. It was alleged that resident was threatened by Administrator that if admission agreement was not signed at that moment R1 will be left out in the street. However, LPA attempted to interview R1 in two occasions and offered them to speak in private, R1 refused to speak to LPA referring to responsible party and expressing that any questions should be directed to their responsible party only. During interviews conducted with Administrator indicated that R1 was never threatened to be left out in the street and provided notices of unpaid monthly fees letter from previous facility dated 9/26/19 which indicated that the facility will terminate the agreement upon 30 days written notice to responsible party and facility didn’t proceed with eviction at that time because they care for their residents and won’t leave residents out in the street. Facility provided a 30-day notice to pay or quit that was issued on 12/17/19 and it was served via personal service to R1 with different housing alternatives and care options but facility once again did not proceed with eviction.
A finding that the complaint allegation Facility threatened resident is unsubstantiated meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
No deficiencies cited during today's inspection.
|