1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed the following:
Based on record review, the Admission Agreement shows Resident #1, the alleged victim, was admitted to the facility on February 4, 2020. According to Appraisal/Needs and services plan dated 2/11/2020, Resident #1 refused to review and participate in the appraisal.
Allegation: Staff failed to provide adequate food service
It is alleged that Staff failed to provide adequate food service.
The department attempted to interview Residents (#1-#11); Resident #1 was not available for interview because he was out of the facility; Residents (#2-#10) were available for interview; two (2) Residents (#11 and #12) refused to be interviewed.
The department’s interview revealed out of nine (9) interviewed residents, eight (8) Residents (#2, #3, #4, $5, #6, #7, #8 and #10) are satisfied with the facility’s food service. Only one (1) Resident (#9) stated food service is not good. Staff #1 and #2 disclosed there is only one resident who keeps complaining about the facility’s food service, but this resident does not take or eat the food provided by the facility. Staff #3, the kitchen supervisor, explained sometimes residents make special requests and the kitchen staff always try to accommodate all residents and ensure the food services are beyond satisfactory. Staff #4-6 reported they have not heard complaints from resident about the facility’s food service. Per department’s review, it is noted in the facility’s Resident Dining Details Report that Resident #5, who stated in the interview the food service is bad, has food allergies and supplements/food preferences. This report was created and maintained to meet the residents’ special needs and requests, according to the Dietary Supervisor (Staff #3). The department also observed in the facility’s Summer Menus that the facility maintains a daily diet of quality and quantity necessary to meet the needs of the residents. Based on LPA’s observations, interviews, and records review, LPA did not find sufficient evidence to support the allegation mentioned above.
|