1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 8/13/2020, the LPA completed the initial virtual visit at 2pm, conducted staff interviews and requested documents. Investigator Hector reviewed medical records on 8/28/2020; interviewed R1’s representatives on 11/05/2020 at 10:19am and 11/06/2020 at 8:58am; interviewed collateral agency staff on 11/05/2020 at 12:20pm; interviewed current staff on 11/6/2020 at 5:04pm, and 11/17/2020 at 11:26am, 11:51am, and 12:17pm; and, interviewed former staff on 11/13/2020 at 12:30pm and on 11/17/2020 at 12:44pm.
Regarding the allegation: Facility neglect resulting in resident developing infections
It was alleged that due to facility neglect, R1 developed multiple infections, which included a urinary tract infection, an eye infection, and vaginal infection. Interviews and a review of Facility Progress Notes revealed that R1 exhibited a change in condition in June 2020, which included an increase in agitation and confusion. As a result, the facility requested a urinalysis order to rule out a urinary tract infection (UTI) and on 7/3/2020, a urinalysis order was created. In addition, interviews and medical records revealed that R1’s physician was notified of the behavior change and R1 was prescribed one anti-depressant tablet daily. The prescription as increased to two tablets daily on 7/9/2020. Yet, it appeared that the urine sample was not delivered to R1’s physician, hence the physician was unable to rule out if R1 developed a UTI. Per interviews, it was confirmed that a family member of R1 had the urine sample, but they were unable to get the sample to the laboratory. However, the facility did not follow up to ensure that the urine sample was delivered to rule out the UTI.
On 7/30/2020, R1 was sent to the Emergency Room for an evaluation of pain. Upon assessment, it was discovered that R1 had a nontraumatic acute kidney injury, dehydration, a urinary tract infection, hyponatremia (low sodium levels) and hypokalemia (low potassium). There was no documentation noting an additional vaginal infection or an eye infection at the time of observation. Interviews revealed that there were multiple reasons as to how R1 could have developed a UTI. Staff denied observing signs and symptoms of dehydration with R1 (such as lethargic, generalized weakness, or dryness of the appearance); comparatively, staff claimed that R1 was drinking fluids and was often seen with or drinking Gatorade.
To further investigate the UTI, Investigator Hector interviewed staff regarding R1’s incontinence needs. Interviews revealed that R1 used pull-ups, yet multiple sources stated that R1 would often keep their soiled pull-ups and would attempt to re-use soiled pull-ups rather than obtain a clean pull-up. Interviews revealed inconsistent information as to whether upper management was notified of this behavior, which, had it been communicated, could have resulted in R1 receiving treatment prior to the 7/30/2020 Emergency Room visit. Such behavior of re-using soiled pull-ups could have contributed in the development of the UTI.
|