1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Per the information obtained, the other items in R1’s room were not removed, yet were rearranged for an unknown reason. Based on the information obtained at the time of the initial visit, it is unknown if R1’s clothes were removed to be washed, and/or if they were retrieved at a later date. The current staff and those who worked at this facility in June 2020 were unable to provide sufficient evidence pertaining to R1’s belongings. Per resident interviews, the majority of residents agreed they had not had anything missing from their rooms.
Based on the availability of evidence, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that the licensee did not safeguard R1's personal belongings and property. This allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
Regarding the allegation: Licensee does not provide a safe environment for residents
It was alleged that Resident #2 (R2) gets into altercations with staff and residents, and that staff do not respond appropriately. As of today, R2 still resides at this facility. However, most of the staff commented that R2’s behavior has improved, and believe it is due to the fact that Administrator Rose Anguiano makes it a point to speak to R2, creates appropriate boundaries with R2, and regularly reminds R2 as to how their behavior must align with facility policies and procedures. Per resident interviews, resident claimed that they feel comfortable residing this facility and believe that in general, staff are responsive if there are altercation and disturbances from residents. In regards to R2, residents claim that they know how to interact with the resident and do not feel unsafe, but feel comfortable communicating any concerns to the facility staff.
Prior administrators and staff were interviewed regarding altercations between residents (complaint# 20200929162632 and complaint #20200904163016), and staff claimed that staff were trained to intervene and separate residents as needed, and would respond to disputes in a timely manner. During today’s visit, staff claimed that whereas R2 may have outbursts, they do not feel unsafe working alongside R2. Whereas there have been incidents with the police being called or other escalating situation, staff and residents believe it was an appropriate response to a situation. The LPA reviewed incident reports pertaining to R2 and noted that whereas incidents occurred, staff appropriately intervened as needed.
Based on the information obtained during the course of the investigation, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that the licensee does not provide a safe environment for residents. This allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.
No deficiencies cited at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.
|