1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation #2: Staff did not safeguard resident’s personal belongings.
The details of this allegation reported that the facility failed to safeguard resident #1 (R1’s) personal belongings. On 02/23/24 at 12: 47 pm – 12: 58 pm the Department interviewed (R1) by telephone. (R1) claimed the facility failed to safeguard her personal property on the day she was transported to Harbor Regional Medical Center on 09/12/23. (R1) claimed to have observed individuals in and out of (R1’s) room and that money that was stored in a portable refrigerator with a lock was stolen. (R1) could not describe the individuals nor unable to determine the roles of the individuals in the facility.
On 02/23/24 between 09:15 am – 10:30 am, the Department interviewed administrator #1 (A1), and staff #1-#3 (S1-S3) reported (4) out (4) verified that this allegation is false. (A1 and S1) claimed (R1) has been a resident for 19 years and has never had any issues with property not safeguarded. (A1 and S1) reported when (R1) was admitted to the hospital on 09/12/23, (R1’s) personal belongings remained in the room locked. (A1) unaware of how long (R1) was going to be away from the facility placed all (R1’s) personal items in an unoccupied locked room room #203. The Department verified all the items listed on (R1’s) Resident Personal Property and Valuables LIC 624 which listed (14) personal property items and (14) were accountable. From 10:26 am – 10:29 am, the Department took photographs of the items as evidence. The Department observed a portable refrigerator sealed with a padlock required a key to open.
On 02/23/24 between 9:30 am – 11:50 am the Department interviewed residents #2-#11 (R2-R11) (10) out of (10) all confirmed their personal belongings were safeguarded and have not gone missing. On 02/23/24 at 10:10 am, (R1) effectively voluntarily terminated her residency with the facility when (R1) authorized in writing for (R1’s) guardian witness #1 (W1) to retrieve (R1’s) personal property. As indicated in (R1’s) discharge summary, “(W1) went up to the storage room and picked out what (W1) wanted to take with (W1)”. (W1) declined to be interviewed by the Department. As a result of the information gathered, there is no evidence to support the allegation mentioned above.
Based on information gathered, an inspection of the facility, observation, and interviews conducted, an analysis of records reviewed, the Department found no evidence to support the allegations mentioned above. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation, did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted with Ginger Enriquez, and copies of the reports were provided. |