1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | After interviews and record review the investigation revealed that there is no preponderance of evidence to support the following allegation: Resident sustained unexplained injury. LPA interviewed 2 out of 7 staff in total. 2 out of 2 denied the allegation. S1 states, the client has a history of self-injurious behavior. No one ever hit C1. The person that’s being alleged doesn’t even work at the facility. S2 states, “no one hit C1. C1 will throw themself down and hit themself all the time. We stop it as much as we can.” LPA was unable to interview any clients due to their cognitive functions. Which includes C1.
During a record review, LPA reviewed C1’s behavior intervention plan for August 11, 2021. Report states that client has a history of self-injurious behavior. Client is currently working on outcomes to help in decreasing their maladaptive behaviors. Client has been on the same outcomes as early as 2016. LPA reviewed a behavior data sheet for the month of October 2022 that shows the facility is working with the client on decreasing them being physically aggressive towards self. LPA reviewed an incident report dated for August 12, 2021 that was sent to Community Care Licensing which speaks to client being hospitalized for a possible seizure around the same timeframe. LPA observed client to be clean, healthy, safe, happy and free of injury.
Based on LPA’s observation, interviews conducted, and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was given.
|