1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Investigative interviews, including outside individuals who visited R1 daily and outside health agencies, revealed that R1 wore incontinence briefs, used a wheelchair, required someone to wheel R1 to the bathroom, and assist R1 to transfer from the wheelchair to the toilet. On or about 6/23/2021, R1 pulled the call light in R1’s room to alert staff that R1’s incontinence brief was soiled. R1 was told by an unidentified staff that R1 would have to wait until the next staff came in for their shift and R1 was left in the soiled brief for hours. Sometime in August 2021, R1’s incontinence brief was wet and R1 was told by an unidentified staff that R1 would have to wait four (4) hours before being changed. Interviews with residents and outside sources indicated that residents waited an average more than 30 minutes for staff to respond to the call light for assistance and had to wait to have incontinence briefs changed or receive assistance to the restroom. Review of the facility’s assisted living floor call light log for a period of 30 days revealed roughly 7% or approximately 152 instances where residents’ call lights were not responded to by staff for 20 minutes or more, including 20 times where the call light was not responded to. The facility’s call light system determined a call light was not responded to after 84 minutes had passed from the initial call. The call light log for R1 revealed seven (7) instances where R1’s call light was not responded to for 20 minutes or more and five (5) instances where R1’s call light was not responded to as determined by the call light system. The Department was unable to interview R1.
It was alleged that the Licensee did not meet the needs of residents. Investigative interviews and record review revealed that R1 required assistance and would utilize the call light in R1’s bedroom to request assistance from facility staff. Review of the facility’s assisted living floor call light log for a period of 30 days revealed roughly 7% or approximately 152 instances where residents’ call lights were not responded to by staff for 20 minutes or more, including 20 times where the call light was not responded to. The facility’s call light system determined a call light was not responded to after 84 minutes had passed from the initial call. Interviews with residents and outside sources indicated that residents waited an average more than 30 minutes for staff to respond to the call light for assistance and would have to wait to have incontinence briefs changed or receive assistance to go to the bathroom. Records review revealed the overnight (NOC) schedule was a total of four (4) staff, one (1) staff was scheduled for the NOC assisted living floor and three (3) staff were scheduled for the NOC memory care floor.
Continued on LIC9099-C page.
|