1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | schizoaffective disorder, was ambulatory, had bowel and bladder impairment and could occasionally communicate. Individual Program Plan for C1 dated March 15, 2021, revealed that C1 is a conserved adult and required incontinence care reminders every two hours.
During the investigation, through record reviews, and interviews, the Department established the following sequence of events. Based on staff statements, on September 13, 2022, Staff 1 (S1) was conducting a routine incontinence check on C1 at on or about 8:30am when S1 found C1 on the floor of C1’s bedroom. C1 was kneeling on the floor with C1’s blankets wrapped around legs. S1 attempted to assess C1 but did not receive a verbal response and noted a blank stare from C1. S1 observed there was a scratch on top of C1’s foot but legs did not appear swollen. S1 then proceeded to request assistance from S2 who had arrived back at the facility at on or around 8:45am from dropping off other clients at day program. S2 then attempted to verbally prompt C1 with no results, S2 then contacted emergency personnel. Records collected revealed that C1 was admitted to hospital emergency room and examined by a physician by 9:56am on September 13, 2022. According to records collected, C1 did not return to facility after being admitted to hospital for medical treatment.
Hospital records revealed C1 was admitted to the hospital for altered mental status, agitation, lower and upper extremity contraction, and muscle rigidity. Additionally, an outside source medical doctor (MD) reviewed C1’s medical records. According to interview with MD, MD determined that C1 was treated on date of incident for a medication reaction based on symptoms, condition, and medical assessment. Interview also revealed that during treatment it was found that C1 had a pre-existing condition of the liver that ultimately resulted in renal failure. It was determined by records that C1’s conservator decided to terminate dialysis treatment which MD revealed may ultimately lead to death. Additionally, based on C1’s complications during hospital stay, MD stated that such complications could have resulted in pneumonia. According to MD, there was no information on records to determine that C1 was treated for a sustained injury. Records also revealed that there was no apparent evidence to indicate C1 was neglected or physically abused. Outside source interview also revealed that C1’s ultimate cause of death was kidney failure and pneumonia.
Based on a review of pertinent records and interviews, the preponderance of the evidence standard was not met to prove staff neglect and/or lack of supervision resulted in serious injury requiring hospitalization for C1, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Mary Meeter, to whom a copy of this report, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) were provided. |