1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | C1 had the toy that C2 was playing with prior to the incident. Staff believe C1 wanted to play with the toy C2 had possessed at the time of the incident and did not want to give it to C1 leading to the incident.
Director Lopez advised that the facility has been working with C1 and their guardian(s). C1 has been on a compliance plan working on behavior, redirection, communicating, building social skills, and other techniques to help prevent/lower incidents. After conducting record reviews, LPAs observed previous incidents and the compliance plan. This isolated incident was the first time C1 had cut/broken another child's skin. Unfortunately it was an accident that occurred when staff observation was directed towards assisting another child. Since the incident has occurred, the facility has taken extra precautions. They are monitoring the child more closely and working with C1's guardian(s). When available an extra staff is assisting help with the child. Facility has shown they are addressing the needs of the children and modifying their procedures to assist with children including C1. Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 12 & Chapter number), 101223(a)(3) Personal Rights are being cited on the attached LIC 9102 technical violation.
There were no deficiencies cited during today's inspection
NOTICE OF SITE VISIT POSTED. |